Research
Our research addresses pressing political questions, with an emphasis on cutting-edge methodology. From political identity formation, to democratic backsliding, to the outbreak of war, the insights that our faculty and students produce illuminate where politics and government are today, and where they are going in the future.
Research Collaborations
The Department of Political Science houses, and works closely with, various interdisciplinary research centers and institutes across campus:
- CEL: The Center for Effective Lawmaking was created in 2017 to advance the generation, communication, and use of new knowledge about the effectiveness of individual lawmakers and U.S. legislative institutions.
- CSDI: The Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions was established in 2009 to support and disseminate systematic theoretical and empirical research on questions central to the health and survival of democratic institutions in the United States and abroad.
- CGD: The Center for Global Democracy is a center for excellence in international survey research. The lab produces the award-winning AmericasBarometer and brings together a diverse network of scholars and students to advance research on survey methods, public opinion, and democracy.
- LGBTQ+ Policy Lab – The LGBTQ+ Policy Lab connects researchers to study the causes and consequences of LGBTQ+ policies.
- RIPS: The Research on Individuals, Politics & Society Lab, the experimental research program in the Department of Political Science, aims to advance empirical research in political behavior while also enriching the learning environment for faculty and students.
- ROCCA Lab: The Research on Conflict and Collective Action Lab serves as a collaborative space for undergraduates, graduate students, and faculty members to produce rigorous social science research on political violence and collective action problems. Each semester, undergraduates work with faculty mentors and their peers on projects ranging from the study of slowing nuclear proliferation to research on small arms trade networks.
Research Stories
Larry Bartels
Larry Bartels has published a new book, The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation. Bartels and coauthor Katherine Cramer used a remarkable decades-long study tracking the political attitudes of people who graduated from high school in 1965 to show how contemporary America’s bitter political divide grew out of disparate reactions to the momentous social changes of the Sixties, including the Civil Rights movement, the Women’s movement, the expanding role of government in the provision of social welfare, and the eroding cultural authority of the police, the military, and religious leaders. The Sixties are generally depicted as an era of inspiring social progress. But many members of the Class of ’65—especially people from modest backgrounds with traditional moral upbrings who did not go to college—opposed that “progress.” By the 1970s they were shifting to the Republican Party in response, and a half-century later many have rallied to the notion that rolling back the social change of the past six decades will Make America Great Again.
Brett V. Benson & Bradley C. Smith
Brett V. Benson and Bradley C. Smith have published a new book, The Window Before: The Politics of Alliance Implementation. The book addresses a critical question: Do military alliances deter or provoke conflict? This book explores this question by examining the often-overlooked phase of alliance implementation, a complex and prolonged process that occurs before an alliance’s deterrent benefits are realized. Professors Benson and Smith argue that the formation of new alliances does not immediately translate into increased military strength. Instead, states must navigate political and military challenges to operationalize their alliance, creating a vulnerable window of time before an alliance is implemented. The authors reveal that while fully realized alliances can enhance deterrence and foster peace, their preliminary stages can provoke conflict, as potential enemies may wage preventive war to counteract the anticipated shift in power.




