Graduate Seminars
Graduate-level seminars are an integral part of the doctorate program. The seminars vary each semester; see the most recent offerings below:
Spring 2025
PHIL 3920/5920.01 Argumentation Theory (T5) – Mezzanine Class
T 3:10–5:30p
Prof. Scott Aikin
Argumentation Theory is the domain of research focusing on the norms of interpersonal reason-exchange. There are epistemic, ethical, practical, and aesthetic objectives behind critical dialogue, and in making these objective explicit, argumentation theorists hope to explain what goes right in good dialogue and what goes wrong in bad. This course will focus first on the early orienting documents of the movement, and then we will read chapters from the forthcoming Routledge Handbook of Argumentation Theory (ed. Aikin, Casey, and Stevens), with cutting edge research agendas. Two short (2-3K) papers.
PHIL 9020.01 Contemporary Metaethics (T2)
T 6:00-8:20p
Prof. Sarah Raskoff
This seminar offers an in-depth exploration of key debates in metaethics, focusing on influential 20th-century formulations and cutting-edge developments of four major views: non-naturalism, naturalism, non-cognitivism, and error theory. We will engage with fundamental questions such as: Do moral thoughts and statements correspond to properties? If so, are these properties natural or “sui generis”? How can different theories account for moral knowledge? And how can they account for the practical or action-guiding role of moral judgments?
PHIL 9010.01 History of Normative Ethics (H6)
W 3:10–5:30p
Prof. Diana Heney
This class is a deep survey of the history of normative ethics in Western philosophy, including readings on eudaimonism, virtue ethics, deontology, utilitarianism, and care ethics. Our goal will be to understand these theories and consider their contemporary relevance. All students will read the core text each week, as well as at least one piece chosen from a set of supplementary readings.
PHIL 9020.02 Philosophy of Emotion (T1)
R 3:10–5:30p
Prof. Matthew Congdon
What is an emotion? Can emotions be rational? If so, how? And what roles might emotional rationality play in ethics? Our aim in this seminar will be to pose these questions by way of a survey of philosophical work on emotions. Our guiding theme shall be the complex relationship between emotions and rationality, with special attention paid to the variety of models of emotional rationality that philosophers have proposed. Authors from the ancient Stoics to the present have urged that emotions are evaluative judgments (e.g., to fear x is to judge that x is dangerous). Others, arguing from a roughly Aristotelian perspective, have urged that emotions are forms of evaluative perception (and so a virtuous person’s perceptions of situations will be colored by appropriate emotional responses). Still others, echoing themes in the traditions of phenomenology and existentialism, have urged that emotions help establish an agent’s “world” in an encompassing sense (as in Sartre’s claim that emotions are “transcendental” structures of consciousness or Karen Jones’ more recent claim that emotions “frame” human agency). Our task shall be to take stock of these and other competing proposals, as a way of critically evaluating the hypothesis that emotional responses form a crucial aspect of human rationality. Readings will span key texts from philosophy of mind, moral psychology, social philosophy, and the history of philosophy, as well as recent work in empirical psychological research on emotion.
PHIL 9020.03 Epistemology (T3)
R 6:00–8:20p
Prof. David Thorstad
This course is an advanced introduction to epistemology. The course will cover core topics including the nature of knowledge, theories of justified belief, and sources of justification. We will conclude with an examination of contemporary topics in epistemology.
Fall 2024
PHIL 8000 Teaching and Research Methods: Graduate Proseminar
T 11:00a-1:00p
Professor Karen Ng
The graduate proseminar aims to provide first-year graduate students with a general orientation into graduate school and academic life in the department. Specifically, students will learn some basics pertaining to research and teaching methods, general practices within the discipline, professionalization towards a career in philosophy, and resources offered by the department and university for research and teaching. Students will also be introduced to the philosophy department faculty and their areas of research and have a chance to hear their unique perspectives on graduate school and the wider profession. In addition to faculty visits, each week we will discuss a different aspect of academic life, including topics such as: writing successful seminar papers; AOSs and AOCs; submitting papers to journals; forming a dissertation committee and dissertation writing; the APA; participating in conferences; the job market; applying for fellowships and grants; crafting a syllabus; scaffolding assignments; classroom dynamics; presentation skills; and more.
PHIL 9000 Maimonides and Friends (H2)
T 1:00-3:20p
Professor Lenn Goodman
Exploring Maimonides’ masterwork, the Guide to the Perplexed. Exiled from Cordoba, the city of his birth, in the wake of the Almohad conquest, Maimonides (1138-1204) became an accomplished physician, jurist, and philosopher. The Guide, his magnum opus in philosophy, aims to show an educated reader how to navigate the straits between logic, science, and philosophy on the one hand and one’s religious commitments on the other. Our reading will center on the new translation from the Arabic original and the philosophical commentary on this text by Lenn Goodman and Phillip Lieberman. We’ll also read Goodman’s companion volume, A Guide to the Guide. The “friends” examined will include the major Muslim philosophers that Maimonides studied closely: al-Farabi, Avicenna, the Ikhwan al-Safa, al-Ghazali, and Ibn Tufayl.
PHIL 9010-01 Kant’s Ethics (H3)
W 3:35-5:55p
Professor Julian Wuerth
What Should I Do? Kant identifies this as one of four questions that together comprise all of philosophy, and Kant answers this question with his ethics. Kant sees an ambiguity built into this question that has undermined all previous attempts at ethics: is it a pragmatic question, a moral question, or both? This course traces the evolution of Kant’s views in ethics and his strategy for disambiguating this question. We start with Kant’s beginnings as a moral sense theorist, next review his grounds for a radical switch to an ethics of reason in 1769, and then, after considering his unpublished work from the “silent decade” of the 1770s, examine his mature ethics in the Groundwork, the Critique of Practical Reason, and the Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone. Here we pay special attention to Kant’s theory of action, the starting points of Kant’s arguments, the role of skepticism, Kant’s distinction between the pragmatic and the moral, his accounts of freedom and the “fact of reason,” and his views on character and our Gesinnung, or moral disposition.
PHIL 9010-02 Marx (H4)
R 2:45-5:05p
Professor Karen Ng
This course is an in-depth philosophical exploration of the work of Karl Marx (1818–1883), ranging from his early writings of the 1840s to the full development of his critique of political economy in the three volumes of Capital. In focusing on the philosophical contributions of Marx’s work, we will consider questions such as the following: How is Marx’s project a continuation or transformation of the philosophical tradition that immediately preceded him, particularly, the work of Hegel and the German idealists? How does Marx’s work set the stage for the tradition of critical theory, and how does Marx understand the normative basis of social criticism? How might we understand the ethical dimensions of Marx’s philosophy? Does Marx present a philosophical anthropology, and if so, what role does it play in his critique of capitalism? How does Marx understand the relation between human beings and nature, and how does this relationship shape his understanding of labor, political economy, and history? The goal of the course is to understand Marx’s contributions to a number of longstanding philosophical questions and how his answers lead to the conclusion that capitalism constitutes a normatively deficient form of ethical life.
PHIL 9020 Ideal and Non-Ideal Theory (T5)
T 3:10-5:30p
Professor Jacob Barrett
This seminar will investigate the ideal and non-ideal theory debate, first, in political philosophy, and second, in neighboring fields. Within political philosophy, ideal theorists aim to characterize the perfectly or ideally just society. The first part of the course will focus on the value of this sort of ideal theorizing in relation to more directly practically relevant forms of non-ideal theorizing — for example, about how to solve the problems of injustice we currently face. Is ideal theory relevant to, or in some important sense prior to, non-ideal theory? If not, might ideal theory be important to do anyway — or might it, conversely, be pointless or even harmful? In the second part of the course, we will explore related debates in fields such as ethics and epistemology, with our precise focus depending on student interest.