ESSAY 1
Essays should be four to five pages in length.The primary purpose of this paper is to develop a persuasive thesis about the material at stake. I do not expect you to carry out major research for your topic. What I would like to see, however, is some closer reading of a selected scene or two in order to illustrate your argument. Please do not hesitate to talk to me about your topic so as to discuss it in further detail. Below are some suggestions. Feel free to modify any of these, or develop your own topic, but please discuss possible modifications with me in person before you start writing. Due date is October 9. Double-spaced; no electronic submissions.
  1. In contrast to classical Hollywood productions, art films want to be actively read, not passively consumed. In his article “The Art Cinema as a Mode of Film Practice,” David Bordwell identifies key differences between classical narrative cinema and art cinema. Using his article as your theoretical base and one of Antonioni’s films we have seen in class as your example, describe how the film structures its narrative and characterizes its protagonists as opposed to a typical Hollywood film.  Make use of specific scenes in the film to illustrate your points.
  2. As David Bordwell emphasizes in his article “The Art Cinema as a Mode of Film Practice,” it is essential to read an art film as the “the work of an expressive individual, ” e.g. as a creation of an auteur (588). Pick 2-3 important scenes from La notte, L’eclisse, or L’avventura” to analyze how “the authorial code” manifests itself. In what way do we see the director’s direct participation in the film?
  3. In his article “The Long Take,” Brian Henderson suggests that the “true cultivation and expression of the image as such – as opposed to the relation between the images, which is the central expressive category of montage – requires the duration of the long take (a single piece of unedited film, which may or may not constitute an entire sentence.” (315) Analyze Antonioni’s use of this filmic technique as seen in La Notte or L’eclisse.
  4. Tom Gunning’s article “Narrative Discourse and the Narrator System” broadens the discussion about film by borrowing terminology from literature studies. Using his article as your theoretical base, describe the mechanisms of narration in Blow Up, focusing specifically on the pro-filmic elements.
  5. Discuss the representation of female protagonists in at least two films of Antonioni. To what extent can we understand Antonioni’s foregrounding of female characters as a (proto)feminist effort?
  6. Discuss instances of humor, playfulness, and laughter in at least two films of Antonioni.
  7. Antonioni seems to have full control over each and every aspect of the cinematic image; nothing regarding what we see and hear in his films is left to chance. At the same time, however, Antonioni tends to show us characters who are “out of control.” Most of his protagonists are unable to navigate their own lives and define reliable frames of reference. Is this a contradiction?
  8. Compare and contrast different characters in Antonioni’s films we can read as directorial stand-ins. What do they tell us about Antonioni’s self-understanding as a filmmaker?
  9. Discuss the role of architectural settings in at least three films of Antonioni.
  10. Discuss the role of material objects in at least three films of Antonioni.
  11. Is there any film among the ones we saw by Antonioni whose ending could be considered a happy one?