Alexander Wille, Fang-yu Li, Paola Laterza

Proust / Benjamin

 

Our reading of Walter Benjamin�s essay On the Image of Proust (1929-1934) focuses on a certain number of points that attracted our attention as particularly exemplary of both Proust’s work and Benjamin’s position towards this author. One of these points is the discrepacy that exists between the sharp, attentive faculties of our consciousness on the one side, and the sensual, creative depths of our unconsciousness on the other side. While the former has an invincible control on our activities during daytime, the latter takes place mostly at night, namely during a time when our attentiveness grows loose and our body acquires a more urgent presence. Proust makes clear for us his preference from the very beginning. The first chapter of Swann’s Way displays a long and detailed description of what the author experienced during his sleepless nights: an intermittent succession of conscious and unconscious states that would give him a priviledged access to suggestions and evocations. He tells us how darkness and silence would favour the emergence of sensations from his childhood and past experiences, how the confusion that followed abrupt awakenings would plunge him into a magic and timeless self, and how the loss of common coordinates would bring him back to a deeper sense of existence. Eventually, the charming power of the night would stir his memory and imagination to the point that he would give up sleeping to spend the all night savouring the disclosure of memories. In claiming the supremacy of the night over the day, of the unconscious over the conscious, Proust immediately introduces one of the most compelling themes of his entire work: the relationship between memory and unconsciousness, and the need to step back from the capacities of our “intelligence” in order to better understand the most profound experiences of our life.

 

Proust’s stance becomes even more meaningful when we compare it to his epoch’s obsession with the awareness and capturing of time The end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth were marked with a bloom of new inventions that would have changed forever the conception of space and time within the society: from the advent of telephone to the invention of the automobile, from the discovery of cinema to the diffusion of the pocket watch. As film theorist Mary Ann Doane explained in her book The Emergence of Cinematic time (2002), such modern inventions reflected the desire of the bourgeoise and of capitalist society to achieve a standardization and rationalization of time for instrumental uses. Proust’s novel abounds of references to the measurement of time (“I would ask myself what time it might be”, “I would strike a match to look at my watch”, “It is midnight”, “half an hour later”, “it’s ten o’clock or even later”, etc.), and his memories from childhood are divided into distinct units of time, each one tied to a specific duty, feeling or expectation (“in the late afternoon, long before the moment when I would have to go to bed”, “After dinner, alas, I soon had to leave Mama”, “I had dinner before everyone else and afterwards I came and sat at the table until eight o’clock when it was understood that I had to go upstairs”, etc.). But the measurement of time in Proust becomes a source of anxiety, because it ties every moment to a present instant, that becomes irrecoverable once past. The child seems to find shelter from these constraints in the fragile and malleable images of the magic lantern, in the suggestion created by books and names, in the peace offered by his mother’s kiss, and in the acute perceptions of senses. As an adult, Proust will find his way to escape contingency and rationalization in the resources of the involuntary memory and the act of writing.

 

In his essay on Proust, Benjamin praises Proust’s ability of keeping awake at times when sleep is customary. Like Proust, Benjamin believes that “the dream world” is capable of more profound similarities than “the wakeful state”, and that the former provides us with the greatest resourcefulness of thought or imagination (On the Image of Proust, p. 238). He evokes the figure of Penelope, who weaves during the day and unravels during night, as a symmetrical counterpart to Proust’s practice of weaving the memory of the past at night and unraveling during the day. Furthermore, Benjamin takes part of Proust’s claim on stepping away from consciousness and from the excess of instrumentalization of bourgeois society.

 

A second point that we have isolated in Benjamin’s texts and in Proust’s brief selection is the difference between experience and recollection. We have already noticed in Benjamin’s Berlin Chronicle how the narrator chose to put us in front of a “montage” of subjective experiences, with no regard to chronology and to an objective historical perspective. We also talked about how Benjamin was more interested in what he remembers of his past, rather than to what he actually lived during his childhood. Similarly, when Benjamin speaks about La Recherce, what interests him is Proust’s abilitity to retell his memories, rather then factual events. According to Benjamin, “(Proust) describes not a life as it actually was, but a life as it was remembered by the one who had lived it”, and “the important thing is not what he experienced, but the weaving of his memory” (On the Image of Proust, pp. 237-238). This priority accorded to the act of recollection brings as a consequence a departure from the traditional, linear plot of the novel. The text becomes an unstoppable flow of flashbacks on the past and anticipations on future, displayed without a chronological order but following the logic of memory. Proust’s characters are subjected to the same process, so that their physical features and personalities keep changing throughout the novel in relation to how the narrator knew them in different periods of his life.  According to Benjamin, what really gives unity to the text is the ability of Proust to weave it as tight as a web (p. 238).

 

Finally, a third point to underline is the difference between voluntary memory and involuntary memory. The voluntary memory is the memory of intelligence and reason: it gives us only a partial, repetitive, isolated image of the events of our past. Therefore it shows only a “dead moment”, something that is lost, something that only belongs to the sphere of the past and does not connect to the present anymore (Swann’s Way, p. 44). Benjamin joins this position when he writes that a voluntary recollection is probably closer to forgetting than what is usually called memory. To Proust, what really gives access to our past is our involuntary memory, namely a sudden emergence of a vivid moment from our past that happens “by chance” when our senses meet a stimulus (an object, a taste, a sound...) already experienced in the past. Similar to the Celtic belief of a soul “imprisoned” in objects that can be rescued only by the fortuitous recognition, Proust believes that our memories are attached to an object, or a sensation, and when by chance we re-experience the object/sensation in the present, it attracts the old moment. In this case, “the spell is broken” and we are suddenly presented with a complete set of images and sensations from our past (Swann’s Way, p. 46). This is exemplified by the famous madeleine moment (pp. 45-48). On the opposite of the voluntary memory, the involuntary memory gives us “a delicious pleasure”, a “powerful joy”, compared to which all other conscious states fade away. It is something that immediately renders “the vicissitudines of life unimportant” and “its brevity innocuous”. The most important feature of the involuntary memory, in Proust’s account, is that it allows us to overcome our anxiety about contingency and death. (p. 45). However, it is also important to point out that the “magic” phenomenon of involuntary memory must be followed by a hard and purposeful work of the conscious mind, in order to come to a full extraction of the evoked memory from our unconscioussness. Proust speaks of this work in terms of “creation”, not just of a mere recollection, and Benjamins uses the word “actualization”. This work of the mind will become Proust’s most important occupation throughout his life, in a ceaseless attempt to recuperate a time that otherwise would go lost forever.