Katie McNeill


[To listen to the aria under discussion please click here]
 

Mozart�s Die Zauberflöte (The Magic Flute) is a masterpiece of eighteenth-century philosophy, in which the wise and enlightened Sarastro defeats the darkly powerful Queen of the Night.  In this opera, the Queen’s daughter, Pamina, is kidnapped (or rather rescued) by Sarastro, and the Queen sends the young Tamino to bring her daughter home, promising that Tamino can marry the young woman when she is returned safely.  When Tamino reaches Pamina, he is won over by Sarastro’s wisdom, and instead of returning the young woman to the Queen, he stays and becomes Sarastro’s disciple.  Tamino must undergo a number of trials (of the intellect) in order to prove himself worthy, and as a prize, he is given Pamina’s hand.

 

The opposition of the Queen and Sarastro in Mozart’s opera is characteristic of the art of the Enlightenment, where an absolute rule is defeated in the face of the rule of reason.  While this division does not seem to fit neatly into Nietzsche’s philosophy, one could in fact argue that the Queen is characteristic of a Wagnerian or Dionysian figure.  She is guided by dark passion and wildness, and her power succeeds because she is able to charm the masses with her beauty and keep them under control by promoting superstitious belief.  In fact, one could compare the power of the Queen to that of Wagner himself, for both pull the masses down, bringing about “that weary shuffling along of the soul which is no longer able either to spring or to fly, nay, which is no longer able to walk” (Contra 58).  Thus, in the face of the Queen, Tamino loses himself and his sense of personal power - in Nietzsche’s words, Tamino “ultimately abandons [himself] to the mercy or fury of the elements: [he] has to swim” (61).  Only when he comes into contact with Sarastro is he able to regain his control and move out of the darkness into the light. 

 

The Queen’s Dionysian character is best demonstrated in her famous aria “Der Hölle Rache kocht in meinem Herzen” (“Hell’s Revenge Boils in my Heart”), in which the Queen tries to convince her daughter Pamina to murder Sarastro and thus enact her mother’s revenge.  The most well known feature of this aria is that it reaches a high F6, which only very few sopranos can achieve, and in fact the range of the singer is likely the first thing one notices when listening to this piece.  On a purely emotional level, the bright and leaping high notes seem to reflect Nietzsche’s call for music that “runs with light feet” rather than dragging one down into decadence.  Without attending to the words, the listener might initially be raised up by the aria into the very state or joy or cheerfulness through which, Nietzsche argues, music “emancipates the spirit” and “gives wings to thought” (The Case 2).

 

The effect of the Queen’s song, however, is not at all an elevation of the listener.  Rather, like Wagner’s music, the queen’s song lulls the listener into a state of blindness (Verblendung) that prevents reflection. (The Queen swayed Tamino this way in an earlier aria.)  In Nietzsche’s terms, both the Queen and Wagner are “virtuosos to their backbone, knowing of secret passages to all that seduces, lures, constrains or overthrows; born enemies of logic and of straight lines, thirsting after the exotic, the strange and the monstrous, and all opiates for the senses and the understanding” (Contra 69-70).  While Wagner used the effects of the tragic and the sublime to sway the masses, the Queen’s lies are cloaked in beauty and mystery.  Because of the Queen’s seductive power, Nietzsche would likely joy at her defeat at the end of the opera.  Sarastro’s last line, in fact, might find its way into Nietzsche own prose: “Die Strahlen der Sonne vertreiben die Nacht, Zernichten der Heuchler erschlichene Macht.”  (“The rays of the sun drive away the night, destroyed is the hypocrites’ surreptitious power.”[i])  Nietzsche would surely hope for the same fate for Wagner and his music. 

 

At the same time, the philosopher would not be likely to jump for joy at Sarastro’s victory, which is based on a loss of innocence this time through normalization instead of seduction.  At the end of the opera, Tamino wins Pamina’s hand only through the suppression of his own joyful individuality.  To succeed, he must surrender himself to Sarastro’s trials, which are based on a submission of self to intellect (reason).  If Nietzsche’s philosophy were really to be acted out in the Zauberflöte, Tamino would not have to go through this directed search for the truth, but rather would win the girl through the attainment of self-release or self-elevation.  This search for truth, according to Nietzsche blinds or distracts from the ideal state as much as the Queen’s Verblendung, for “We no longer believe that truth remains truth when it is unveiled, . . . To-day it seems to us good form not to strip everything naked, not to be present at all things, not to desire to ‘know’ all.  Tout comprendre c’est tout mépriser.” (Contra 82). Therefore, while the Queen’s song reflects what Nietzsche most hates in Wagner’s music, Mozart’s opera does not demonstrate an enactment of Nietzsche’s philosophy, but rather a trading of a modern failure of self for an older one.

 



[i] Translation of die Zauberflöte found at http://www.aria-database.com/translations/magic_flute.txt.